The Washington DC Effect

miles to go2

“Perspective is everything” and “perception is reality” have become the Wordist’s way of restating the ‘theory of relativity’ in social terms.

The Nation, which our founding fathers fought and died for and their Posterity built from its ashes, has mutated into one giant ‘all-inclusive’ Sandals Resort. This “flip-flops only” immigration destination is replete with free education for “refugees”, in-state tuition rates for anchor babies, and Constitutional rights for everybody. All on the backs of our ancestors and at the expense of OUR children and grandchildren.

Let me be clear, geographical proximity to Washington DC does NOT guarantee one constitutional rights and special privileges. Earned citizenship and shared, spilled blood does that.

Sometimes proximity to problem-solving or an ongoing project blurs a man’s strategic focus and clouds his vision. These particular points in time represent opportunities where an objective professional can truly add value in industry or on the campaign trail. As is the case with the white mantra and the swarm’s meme seeding, perhaps we’re all positioned a little too close to our hard work to see the fruits of our labor, let alone accurately predict likely net outcomes.

Today, Dr. David Duke announced that a vote against Trump (and inaction on our part) is treason against our race. While I’m all for call to action, a large part of my soul remains skeptical about this assertion. Both Marco Rubio’s and John Kasich’s names have been bandied about lately. Then, yesterday, the Teflon Don told CNN that he will likely pick “a political insider.” Uh-oh… alarm bells and train whistles should be going off everywhere; standby to standby for a healthy salvo of Bob Whitaker “I told you so’s.”

Will Donald Trump unwind our tightly-wound memetic velvet web by selecting a paycheck cuckservative or non-White for Vice President? Wait. Isn’t this the year of the outsider? We’ll know for certain if Donald Trump is the real deal when he selects a pro-white dissident or less than respectable conservative for Vice President. I’m thinking Ann Coulter or Patrick Buchanan would seal the deal for me. Nevertheless, it appears to me that we’ve covered new ground in near record time.

Another major challenge with pioneering new frontiers is being unable to use history as a barometer and project likely net outcomes. Many on our team have run into this phenomenon lately, even our good ol’ coach.

Think of this challenge as a bit like attempting to triangulate with only one known node or “solving for x” with only one known variable. My major concern is that a brighter future for our children is largely running on fumes and guttural, killer instinct here, folks.

The most important takeaway is not so much knowing what to expect, but that we are pioneering new frontiers at all. No matter the outcome of this election year and its midterm spinoff, what’s crystal clear is that BUGS has stretched the Overton Window so far right that we have now made the impossible possible… again.

We have done our part on this leg of the journey. Now, it is America who must choose wisely… in 2024.

As they say, “The sky’s the limit,” and we all have “miles to go before I sleep.”


White Men Need Not Apply


Recently, the President of Missouri University (and other Whites) was forced to resign from his position for not prosecuting “racism” on Mizzou’s campus thoroughly enough. This came about because the Mizzou football team threatened to renege on their athletic scholarships and sit-out until their long list of demands was met. Never mind, the unspoken and ongoing threat of anti-White terrorism on campus if University brass ignored the Black Lives Matter thugs. As usual, nobody called them on their bullshit and there are no lawyers with the requisite intestinal fortitude to take on a White client on that basis alone.

So, I wrote former Mizzou President Tim Wolfe to let him know that he was now one of us, whether he liked it or not:

“Disagreement is not hate. Free speech is not hate. Chasing Europid whites down for exercising our Constitutional rights does, in fact, constitute anti-White hate.”

Their motive is clear: There exists no explicit protection for White males under the letter of the law, only what is written in the Preamble. And there is no White family unit without productive White males.

We are not allowed to sue for anti-White discrimination in the workplace because everyone, including us, expects “privileged White males” to secure another job – and fast. After all, tax revenue doesn’t grow on trees. Everyone always seems less convinced that non-Whites will become productive again if terminated.

So, they are coddled, paid to stay in school, and “protected” like the ugly ape at the zoo. This assertion can be tested by observing the look on people’s faces when a White man applies for extended unemployment benefits, food stamps or witnessing a liberal talk about “historically low” unemployment figures. We aren’t included in the figures because we have no excuse.

The only way this trend will be reversed is if we do the heavy lifting and expose this anti-White system and its goal, our genocide “by any means necessary.”

The Trump Train & Anti-White Traitors Who Fear It

TRUMP train

Obama studied Constitutional law so he could circumvent the laws, not enforce them.

If Trump really wants to get patriotic and literal about the Constitution, the courts are going to be busy bees prosecuting anti-White criminals for treason. Jobs for everyone!

The preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America reads, and I quote:


“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Now, there is nothing I or anyone can do to help if you cannot grasp the significance of the text in bold. A preamble is defined as a summary or introduction that DESCRIBES or outlines the purpose of a legal document.

The Constitution also makes provisions for the LOSS of citizenship which was fraudulently gained and other measures for removing undesirables in the 14th amendment. And it makes additional provisions for prosecuting treason. Never mind borderline tyrannical, executive orders.”Laws already on the books”, as in ‘since the beginning of the Constitution’s ratification’ will suffice:


The Fourteenth Amendment does not provide any procedure for revocation of United States citizenship. Under the Supreme Court precedent of Afroyim v. Rusk, loss of 14th-Amendment-based U.S. citizenship is possible only under the following circumstances:[28]

Fraud in the naturalization process. Technically this is not loss of citizenship, but rather a voiding of the purported naturalization and a declaration that the immigrant never was a U.S. citizen.

Voluntary relinquishment of citizenship. This may be accomplished either through renunciation procedures specially established by the State Department or through other actions (e.g., treason) which demonstrate an intention to give up U.S. citizenship.[29] Such an act of expatriation must be accompanied by an intent to terminate United States citizenship.[30]…of_citizenship

You may recall that Trump even talked about the 14th amendment a month ago. In short, anti-Whites and foreign invaders are officially federally-f___ed if Trump gets elected. Their departure may or may not go down something like this

“Do you confess to fraudulently gaining citizenship? Sign here… Good bye.”


“Where are your papers please? Social security number please… Good bye.”

Now does it make sense why both sides are so scared? They stand to lose every penny they gained through demanding your silence, massaging the anti-White system and committing treason against the American people. The savvy politicians get it and they hate the Constitution that Mr. Donald Trump stands to restore.

No matter how you slice it, Americans win if Trump becomes President.

The #NRA, #Teachers and White #Schools?


White schools, White teachers, white students… White WOMEN, you’re next. This #Diversity train doesn’t stop after chasing down White men.

“The NRA’s proposal of posting an armed guard at every school is absurd.” – Mommy Professor

“The NRA wants to put a police officer in front of every school. That’s just nuts.” – Chuck Schumer

“How are we going to fund this program? We’re broke; we’re out of money” – Bill O’Reilly

Naturally, the Sandy Hook massacre triggered emotional responses from parents on both ends of the political spectrum. Right on cue anti-whites rushed in to say “The only way to solve these problems of massacres is with less guns.” Wayne LaPierre of the NRA jumped out in front and said that “The only way to stop bad guys with guns is a good guy with a gun.” They made it their mission to take the torch and secure ALL schools, once and for all, while the left shamelessly used the massacre as fuel to wage war on a largely white, law-abiding population. And what about the latest string of threats against White students in majority black schools in Florida?

As usual, they make no mention of disarming these anti-White criminals.

Conventional Wisdom and Political Correctness went further on CNN saying, “Not so fast, RACISTS. We ALREADY HAVE armed guards and police officers in the schools that need them.”

You could almost see the audience raise a collective eyebrow. Their sense of self preservation helped them exercise their ‘right to remain silent’.

How come these school massacres seem to have a knack for occurring in predominantly white schools?

Why is it that armed guards and police officers are “already in place where they need to be” when schools are “under threat” from gang-related activity? Does gang-related activity now include white gangs? Will it ever? When was the last time a massacre like Sandy Hook or Columbine took place in a predominantly non-white school? So, why are non-white schools more important to secure?

Simply put, Mommy Professor DEMANDED that white schools remain unprotected because she cannot see a future which includes white children. Her anti-White religion dictates that she has no obligation to do so. In fact, she and The Holy Anti-White Church of Political Correctness won’t allow for the security of our posterity. The high priestess and his anti-White minions have spoken.

The following is a list of ten questions that can render you victim of anti-White socioeconomic terror:

  1. Are lawyers and defendants in courtrooms, doctors and patients in hospitals, pilots and passengers on airplanes, athletes and sports sports fans in athletic stadiums, congress and staffers on capitol hill, and merchants and consumers in the Mall of America really more important than our children?
  2. Why don’t we hear anyone talking about removing police and contract security from those institutions? Where was the public outcry when these security measures were implemented?
  3. If the goal is to keep our children “shielded from evil guns”, are children not allowed in airplanes, courtrooms, stadiums, malls or hospitals?
  4. I’m hearing about “violating the culture of education with armed guards.” Air marshals travel on airplanes. What about ‘school marshals’ or a silent security? Restoring our teachers’ right to carry and protect themselves would effectively make this exercise both random and anonymous by nature.
  5. Why does the anti-White school system dictate that OUR  children remain ear-marked for terrorism?
  6. How do we disarm people who have no regard for the rule of law?
  7. The experts who are consulted to deal with a problem seem to qualify by being the very people who made oversights in the first place. Why should we continue to accept that from quote experts unquote?
  8. Criminals will continue to gain access to guns unless we devise a plan for melting down absolutely, positively 100% of the firearms on the face of the Earth. Has such a plan been drafted and is that even realistic?
  9. When will Europid White teachers’ access to their second amendment rights be restored?
  10. When will liberals put their egos aside and agree to stop discriminating against Europid WHITE children and their right to a safe learning environment?

The day anti-white European Americans begin concerning themselves with the safety of OUR children, our teachers, and our women is the day they become non-white.

Diverse means formerly White.

#FreeSpeech at the beach


A fool is one who reaches down to the sand, takes a pinch between his fingers and proclaims, “BEHOLD, the beach!”

Patriotards are really no different than the fool who experiences the beach one pinch at a time. The latitude to say what the anti-White establishment allows you to say and still keep your job is not an exercise in free speech. It is government-mandated conformity to Political Correctness.

Neither is it freedom of speech to be forced to acknowledge boundaries from which one can then practice applying their “inalienable” and “unbridled” rights. Nor is it freedom if one must ask permission or apply for a government permit prior to using it.

So, why do so-called Tea Party Patriots and quote Respectable Conservatives unquote continue to cite “freedom” when it’s painfully obvious that the phrase “constitutional rights” (and its explicit guaranteed freedom) no longer applies to Europid Whites?

Are they still getting paid for exercising political discretion?

Is ‘White Privilege’ really built around the de facto concept of European Americans securing and possessing fewer Constitutional guarantees than their minority counterparts?